@VivianaDiPietro suggested that as we have the -stats part of the pipeline. It would be helpful to compare the input genomes a little bit, to ensure that there are no issues. If one genome only has 80% of busco genes, we would not expect it to be well documented in terms of expansion genes, for example.
We already have BUSCO in the pipeline, but maybe it can make a decent report and warn the user if some samples are not really compatible.
@VivianaDiPietro suggested that as we have the -stats part of the pipeline. It would be helpful to compare the input genomes a little bit, to ensure that there are no issues. If one genome only has 80% of busco genes, we would not expect it to be well documented in terms of expansion genes, for example.
We already have BUSCO in the pipeline, but maybe it can make a decent report and warn the user if some samples are not really compatible.