Skip to content

Mass vs. pT sorting #12

@thaarres

Description

@thaarres

Sorting by pT might make more sense than by mass (especially for qV search, where q jet has m=0). Stick to mass-sorting when comparing limits with B2G-17-001, then move to pT-sorting.
(Aside: Synch-issues arising from doing first mass-sorting and then apply Mjj+dEta cut (SFrame), versus the other way around (CMG))

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions