Sorting by pT might make more sense than by mass (especially for qV search, where q jet has m=0). Stick to mass-sorting when comparing limits with B2G-17-001, then move to pT-sorting.
(Aside: Synch-issues arising from doing first mass-sorting and then apply Mjj+dEta cut (SFrame), versus the other way around (CMG))
Sorting by pT might make more sense than by mass (especially for qV search, where q jet has m=0). Stick to mass-sorting when comparing limits with B2G-17-001, then move to pT-sorting.
(Aside: Synch-issues arising from doing first mass-sorting and then apply Mjj+dEta cut (SFrame), versus the other way around (CMG))