From 29f91f9c651cf5df5a8ee723b880c044356df47f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Seongho Bae Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 11:34:10 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] docs: record PR16 landing plus side-chain restacks PR #16 landed the writer-stack tip in develop; PRs #10/#11 restacked without force with exact-head CI GREEN and zero unresolved threads. Records PR #1's remaining blockers. Docs-only. --- docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md b/docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md index a34225c..ff966c9 100644 --- a/docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md +++ b/docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ The restart/restore slice remains bounded CI evidence and does not enable a host On 2026-09-09 the review-to-merge loop collapsed the writer stack through ordinary merge commits without force-push, branch deletion, or protection changes, following the PR #9 precedent for unprotected stacked branches. PRs #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8 merged bottom-up between 01:10:44Z and 01:14:13Z, each with exact-head `verify` GREEN, zero unresolved review threads, and MERGEABLE/CLEAN state re-fetched immediately before its merge. The local-only restore-contract commit `878d0ce` was pushed as a new branch and opened as successor PR #14 on the PR #8 head; its Codex P2 review correctly showed the URL and `collection_without_retention_count` markers could not detect a coupled revision-`...0003` seed-plus-query change from `none` to `applies`. Commit `d0da193` binds the `...0003`/`none` seed tuple, its `support_email` item seed, and the revision-specific query predicates together; a negative control proved the old markers pass that coupled mutation while the new predicates fail it, and the review thread was resolved with that evidence. CI `34298653319` passed on `d0da193`, and PR #14 merged at 01:25:12Z. PR #13 (dependency pin and toolchain classification for issue #12) merged at 01:19:32Z on its immutable GREEN pair of head `eff7ec19f511` and CI `34251045288`, advancing the docs readiness branch to `bbea5c9`, whose fresh `verify` (`34298735574`) is GREEN. No PR was closed: 9 merges leave drafts #1, #10, and #11 open, each retaining a valid delta. `develop` still declares 16 `latest` occurrences, which explains PR #1's `dependency-review` failure; the pinned manifest (zero `latest`) sits at the top of the side chain and reaches `develop` only through the PR #10 to #11 to down-chain successor path. PR #1's remaining failures are the two CodeQL compatibility analyses plus `dependency-review`; `verify`, Noema, OpenCode, Strix, Semgrep, Trivy, OSV, and Scorecard are GREEN on its current head. Central-workflow run logs live in the organization central repository, so a leaf-side run fetch returns 404; such incidents go through the central owner path rather than leaf-side churn or bypass. The chain tip carrying the full writer delta is `origin/codex/policyweave-concurrent-writer-evidence` (`df9eef5`), with sibling successors `codex/policyweave-json-export` (PR #10, draft; its buyer-visible export enablement needs product review plus a base update now that its base moved) and this ledger branch stacked above it. The repository has no scheduled workflow (only `ci.yml`, no `schedule` trigger), so the hourly cadence is served by the autoresearch loop's own status messages rather than an in-repo scheduler. This remains CI durability evidence with no hosted adapter, tenant authorization, audit, encryption, or released datastore. +PR #16 landed the full writer-stack tip in `develop` at `7bf0fa9`. The side chain was then restacked without force: PR #10 head merged tip `111400a` via `cef8c0b` (auto-merged baseline/test regions verified coherent with no markers; merged-tree local gates GREEN with 71/71 tests), and PR #11 head merged the restacked export head via `e67c34c` with one Active-order conflict resolved by preserving both sides. Merged-tree local gates were GREEN (lint, 76/76 tests, build). Both restacks requested fresh CodeRabbit review; exact-head CI `34301731941` (PR #10) and `34302266597` (PR #11) are GREEN on the restacked heads with zero unresolved threads on either. PR #1 on the new `develop` head still fails only the two CodeQL compatibility analyses plus `dependency-review` (16 `latest` declarations remain in `develop`; pins travel down-chain after the export/readiness drafts land), while every other central check is GREEN. No PR was closed in this turn; drafts #1, #10, and #11 retain valid deltas. + ## Current baseline | Area | Evidence | Status | Commercialization gap | Owner/action | Next verification |