You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
central reusable workflow source: ContextualWisdomLab/.github@0774e29acd7d4688fa2224f1c6fe6c56a03bbbb6
workflow run: 33547273531
failing job: 99987788190 (noema-review)
First failing boundary
The review sidecar and repository-scoped reviewer token are successfully provisioned and the target head remains exact-current. The model phase then fails during verdict-envelope validation/repair:
initial model output references reviewed line 1, which is not an exact changed-side line;
the job exits 1. Raw model output is intentionally not written to public logs because a model can echo or hallucinate credential-shaped material.
This is a central review-control/model-output validation failure, not a LineageWeave source finding. Leaf product source must not be changed to satisfy it.
RED acceptance
Add deterministic central tests covering at least:
a structurally valid verdict that cites a line outside the exact changed-side line set;
repair output that is truncated/malformed JSON;
combined invalid-line + malformed-repair output;
preservation of exact repository / PR / expected_head_sha binding throughout both phases.
The test must demonstrate that invalid model evidence cannot become a synthetic source finding or a passing review.
Smallest acceptable behavior
For invalid source-line evidence, attempt only bounded schema/line repair. If repair remains invalid or unparsable, emit a typed model/infrastructure ABSTAIN / UNAVAILABLE (or existing equivalent) decision envelope that is distinct from semantic source findings. Preserve fail-closed merge readiness: the required check must not become green merely because semantic review was unavailable unless the central governance contract explicitly defines and separately satisfies a safe unavailable-review path.
Do not log raw model output. Do not broaden reviewer credentials. Do not weaken exact-head / live-source checks.
GREEN acceptance
valid model verdict JSON parses and every line-bound finding maps to an actual changed-side line;
invalid-line or malformed-repair output is represented as typed review-unavailable/model-output evidence rather than an invented source-code defect;
current exact-head binding is rechecked before publication;
central tests cover malformed/truncated output without logging the raw payload;
Affected exact evidence
ContextualWisdomLab/LineageWeave#8977180068eedf40689e267e85478a9ad46981bcb82ContextualWisdomLab/.github@0774e29acd7d4688fa2224f1c6fe6c56a03bbbb63354727353199987788190(noema-review)First failing boundary
The review sidecar and repository-scoped reviewer token are successfully provisioned and the target head remains exact-current. The model phase then fails during verdict-envelope validation/repair:
1, which is not an exact changed-side line;Expecting ',' delimiter ... char 5224);This is a central review-control/model-output validation failure, not a LineageWeave source finding. Leaf product source must not be changed to satisfy it.
RED acceptance
Add deterministic central tests covering at least:
repository / PR / expected_head_shabinding throughout both phases.The test must demonstrate that invalid model evidence cannot become a synthetic source finding or a passing review.
Smallest acceptable behavior
For invalid source-line evidence, attempt only bounded schema/line repair. If repair remains invalid or unparsable, emit a typed model/infrastructure
ABSTAIN/UNAVAILABLE(or existing equivalent) decision envelope that is distinct from semantic source findings. Preserve fail-closed merge readiness: the required check must not become green merely because semantic review was unavailable unless the central governance contract explicitly defines and separately satisfies a safe unavailable-review path.Do not log raw model output. Do not broaden reviewer credentials. Do not weaken exact-head / live-source checks.
GREEN acceptance