Skip to content

SV annotation - merge order looses some translocation annotation #581

Description

@dnil

VEP annotation should precede merger of SV files. Caller VCFs (manta, TIDDIT) have separate (linked) entries for both ends of a translocation. While this may be redundant, VEP is not yet translocation aware, and fails to annotate one (the numerically higher chromosome) if applied after merge.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions