diff --git a/.backlog/items.json b/.backlog/items.json index fe51488..dadbc36 100644 --- a/.backlog/items.json +++ b/.backlog/items.json @@ -1 +1,25 @@ -[] +[ + { + "id": "backlog/flashy-ledger/reconcile-version-and-target-flashynetwork", + "rev": 3, + "kind": "blocker", + "status": "done", + "title": "Reconcile the ledger’s version, then publish to @flashynetwork once named", + "source": { + "repo": "repo/flashy-ledger" + }, + "assertedBy": "agent/flashy-ledger-bot", + "asserted": "2026-10-29", + "expires": "2026-11-12", + "visibility": "public", + "detail": "Correction: this item was filed on a stale, shallow clone of this repository that predated commit c00c482c (2026-10-26, \"Rename the package to @flashyos/ledger, version 1.0.1\"). That commit already did exactly what this item asked for, for a better-documented reason than I had: the GitHub org rename (FlashyLabs -> AgenteLabs) broke @flashylabs’s GitHub Packages scope resolution outright, so ClaimYour.Gold’s npm ci started 404ing on @flashylabs/ledger@0.8.0. The fix published @flashyos/ledger 1.0.1 to PUBLIC npm (not GitHub Packages) and updated this repo’s own package.json, .npmrc (removed) and publish.yml to match; ClaimYour.Gold’s dependency is confirmed updated to \"@flashyos/ledger\": \"^1.0.1\" on its own main. All three numbers this item worried about now agree. It was not an out-of-band hand-publish — it was a committed, reasoned CI change I simply hadn’t read before filing this. The one thing still genuinely open is the later move from @flashyos/ledger to @flashynetwork/ledger once that scope is actually used for something — tracked in flashyos’s own backlog item on the @flashynetwork decision, not here.", + "owner": "person/michael", + "capabilitiesWanted": [ + "npm-administration" + ], + "promoted": { + "at": "2026-10-29", + "by": "person/michael" + } + } +] diff --git a/backlog.fragment.json b/backlog.fragment.json index ca4231f..3566c16 100644 --- a/backlog.fragment.json +++ b/backlog.fragment.json @@ -3,6 +3,30 @@ "backlog": "1", "source": "repo/flashy-ledger", "org": "org/flashy-ledger", - "generated": "2026-10-29T04:44:17.574Z", - "items": [] + "generated": "2026-10-29T15:09:51.656Z", + "items": [ + { + "id": "backlog/flashy-ledger/reconcile-version-and-target-flashynetwork", + "rev": 3, + "kind": "blocker", + "status": "done", + "title": "Reconcile the ledger’s version, then publish to @flashynetwork once named", + "source": { + "repo": "repo/flashy-ledger" + }, + "assertedBy": "agent/flashy-ledger-bot", + "asserted": "2026-10-29", + "expires": "2026-11-12", + "visibility": "public", + "detail": "Correction: this item was filed on a stale, shallow clone of this repository that predated commit c00c482c (2026-10-26, \"Rename the package to @flashyos/ledger, version 1.0.1\"). That commit already did exactly what this item asked for, for a better-documented reason than I had: the GitHub org rename (FlashyLabs -> AgenteLabs) broke @flashylabs’s GitHub Packages scope resolution outright, so ClaimYour.Gold’s npm ci started 404ing on @flashylabs/ledger@0.8.0. The fix published @flashyos/ledger 1.0.1 to PUBLIC npm (not GitHub Packages) and updated this repo’s own package.json, .npmrc (removed) and publish.yml to match; ClaimYour.Gold’s dependency is confirmed updated to \"@flashyos/ledger\": \"^1.0.1\" on its own main. All three numbers this item worried about now agree. It was not an out-of-band hand-publish — it was a committed, reasoned CI change I simply hadn’t read before filing this. The one thing still genuinely open is the later move from @flashyos/ledger to @flashynetwork/ledger once that scope is actually used for something — tracked in flashyos’s own backlog item on the @flashynetwork decision, not here.", + "owner": "person/michael", + "capabilitiesWanted": [ + "npm-administration" + ], + "promoted": { + "at": "2026-10-29", + "by": "person/michael" + } + } + ] } diff --git a/public/.well-known/backlog.json b/public/.well-known/backlog.json index 39fc8e5..1d09409 100644 --- a/public/.well-known/backlog.json +++ b/public/.well-known/backlog.json @@ -3,6 +3,30 @@ "backlog": "1", "source": "repo/flashy-ledger", "org": "org/flashy-ledger", - "generated": "2026-10-29T04:44:17.577Z", - "items": [] + "generated": "2026-10-29T15:09:51.659Z", + "items": [ + { + "id": "backlog/flashy-ledger/reconcile-version-and-target-flashynetwork", + "rev": 3, + "kind": "blocker", + "status": "done", + "title": "Reconcile the ledger’s version, then publish to @flashynetwork once named", + "source": { + "repo": "repo/flashy-ledger" + }, + "assertedBy": "agent/flashy-ledger-bot", + "asserted": "2026-10-29", + "expires": "2026-11-12", + "visibility": "public", + "detail": "Correction: this item was filed on a stale, shallow clone of this repository that predated commit c00c482c (2026-10-26, \"Rename the package to @flashyos/ledger, version 1.0.1\"). That commit already did exactly what this item asked for, for a better-documented reason than I had: the GitHub org rename (FlashyLabs -> AgenteLabs) broke @flashylabs’s GitHub Packages scope resolution outright, so ClaimYour.Gold’s npm ci started 404ing on @flashylabs/ledger@0.8.0. The fix published @flashyos/ledger 1.0.1 to PUBLIC npm (not GitHub Packages) and updated this repo’s own package.json, .npmrc (removed) and publish.yml to match; ClaimYour.Gold’s dependency is confirmed updated to \"@flashyos/ledger\": \"^1.0.1\" on its own main. All three numbers this item worried about now agree. It was not an out-of-band hand-publish — it was a committed, reasoned CI change I simply hadn’t read before filing this. The one thing still genuinely open is the later move from @flashyos/ledger to @flashynetwork/ledger once that scope is actually used for something — tracked in flashyos’s own backlog item on the @flashynetwork decision, not here.", + "owner": "person/michael", + "capabilitiesWanted": [ + "npm-administration" + ], + "promoted": { + "at": "2026-10-29", + "by": "person/michael" + } + } + ] }