Skip to content

Content duplication creating maintenance burden? #26

@chrisb13

Description

@chrisb13

We've noticed that much of the content in here is also in the ACCESS Hive docs here. This then gets propagated to places like:

I'm just wondering if this creates a maintenance burden when these changes become out of date or need to be updated? In general, I'm in favour of having as few sources of documentation as possible. So could we not just link to the hive docs in this case?

This came up because we're in the process of creating config' docs where we are intending to house model specific guidance on these kinds of issues.

Ping'ing @CodeGat @jo-basevi @anton-seaice @atteggiani who might have thoughts?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions